Deontologism vs. Utilitarianism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Deontologism vs. Utilitarianism - Essay ExampleIt advocates for pretty consideration of other peoples interests succession undertaking an pull through. Simply put, utilitarianism states that we ought to promote the greatest serious for the greatest reduce of people or in another form, inflict less harm on the least number of people (Kanniyakonil, 2007, p. 65). A utilitarian would therefore contemplate the practical imp feigns of his or her compriseion to other members of the society. Based on the doctrine, an act that threatens other peoples stakes is therefore avoided while a beneficial act is promoted. Singer, based on his four principles, argues that pain is bad, consideration into harmful acts should not be discriminatory and should be based on consequences of contemplated actions (Rachels and Rachels, 2007, p. 281). Utilitarianism can be understood from two perspectives, act utilitarianism, and rule utilitarianism (Kanniyakonil, 2007, p. 65). Act utilitarianism is based o n each action by a person, which ought to always be consistent with the honourable principle of upper limit nifty. It is defined by the go steady that good actions leads to good instead than harmful results. Act utilitarianism therefore judges actions from the specific consequences of a particular act, or intentions into such consequences preferably an existing moral value (Kanniyakonil, 2007). ... The two approaches therefore differ with respect to time of determination of what is good and what is evil. While action utilitarianism determines faith upon an action or upon contemplation of an act, rule utilitarianism pre determines morality upon conception of an ethical value in a society (Kanniyakonil, 2007). Utilitarianism is further understood from four philosophical perspectives, welfarism, consequentialism, aggregative, and maximizing (Kanniyakonil, 2007, p. 66). fit to welfarism, utilitarianism is fundamentally determined by the resultant good from an initiative. Cosequen sialism on the other hand focuses on the impacts of an act as opposed to its nature. Consequential theory therefore evaluates and determines an action with respect to available alternates to the action and approves the intimately beneficial alternative. Aggregative and maximizing concepts of utilitarianism are on the other hand based on the view that even the most beneficial alternative is associated with possible reservations into unhappiness (Kanniyakonil, 2007). Associated problems Utilitarianism, regardless of its assumed appeal to maximum good from actions, has a number of associated problems. One of the problems faced under utilitarianism, and with respect to determination of the best alternative for maximum good is its reliance on probability. This means that there is no accurate measure of possible good to justify utilitarian approach to determining ethics (Kanniyakonil, 2007). Rachels and Rachels also identify a number of problems that seems to undermine the basic princip les and assumptions of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is for instance associated with injustice. This based on the difference in scope between morality and law. In